If you recruit, hire, train and manage people, you are
engaged in fighting the war of talent every day. You are tired- tired of
resignations on short notice, tired of new hires leaving after only a few days
on the job, tired of spending so much of your time and money on recruitment and
on getting new hires up to speed, tired of the disruptions in customer service
created when a key person quits, tired of asking your other workers to pick up
the slack, and tire of the way it feels to be “fired” by one of your employees.
Think for a moment about the jobs you’ve held and why you left them. Also
consider any good performer who has left your current or previous employers. In
how many of these situations did the reason for leaving originate from
dissatisfaction with the job or work environment?
In exit interviews, departing employees most often say they
left for “a better opportunity” which is usually taken to mean “more money”.
Actually, it often does mean they received a salary offer greater than what
they were previously making, but there are usually deeper motivations involved.
Many top performers get calls from recruiters enticing them to pursue more
lucrative positions with other companies. Yet they often decline to pursue
these opportunities. Why? Because they are satisfied where they are. The top
performers who do pursue these invitations are usually dissatisfied in one or
more key areas- growth prospects, lack of challenge or a poor relationship with
the boss. We refer these as “push-factors” because they push the employee in
the direction of leaving the company.
One of the key “push-factors” is the employee’s inability to
see any link between performance and pay. It is demotivating to most top
performers when they work harder and smarter and get better results than their
peers, yet receive the same percentage pay increase, bonus or promotion. If an
employee perceives no growth or advancement opportunities, even when they
exist, then for all practical purposes, they do not exist. In a common
scenario, an employee announces his resignation to his manager, who responds,
“I’m surprised and disappointed, I had plans for you.” This often happens
because neither the manager nor the employee has taken time to schedule a
meeting where career options and opportunities can be discussed.
All workers need to believe that their work is centrally
important to the success of the enterprise, whether the job is restaurant
server, housekeep, data processor, factory worker or bank teller. This means that
the employee’s manager needs to convey with strong belief, exactly how the
worker’s job is central to the company’s mission. Manager must be willing to
back up his statement of belief by offering viable rewards of some kind based
on the employees’ actual performance. Sometimes, when employees resign, they
have the reason of not being able to tolerate abusive manager. Waves of
downsizings and proliferation of toxic and abusive companies have killed
loyalty. It’s no wonder that younger workers than ever aspire to the dream of
self-employment rather than their parents dream of working for a large
corporation.
No comments:
Post a Comment